Page 102 - Kỷ yếu hội thảo khoa học lần thứ 12 - Công nghệ thông tin và Ứng dụng trong các lĩnh vực (CITA 2023)

86

applications for these methods. Social influence refers to the impact that one person's
actions or opinions can have on the behavior or beliefs of others. In contrast,
aggregation methods involve combining individual opinions or preferences to arrive
at a group decision or consensus. Therefore, understanding the strengths and
weaknesses of different methods in different situations could help identify the most
appropriate approach to use for a given problem or decision-making process.

References

1. Surowiecki J. The Wisdom of the Crowds. New York City. United States: Anchor Books,
a division of Random House; 2005.
2. Hong L, Page SE. Some microfoundations of collective wisdom. Collective
wisdom. 2012:56-71.
3. Page SE. Where diversity comes from and why it matters? European Journal of Social
Psychology. 2014;44(4):267-79.
4. Cronin P, Ryan F, Coughlan M. Undertaking a literature review: a step-by-step approach.
British Journal of Nursing. 2008;17(1):38-43.
5. Hendry C, Farley AH. Reviewing the literature: a guide for students. Nursing standard
(Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987). 1998;12 44:46-8.
6. OpenStax. Introductory Business Statistics 2023. Available from:
https://stats.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Applied_Statistics/Introductory_Business_Statistic
s_(OpenStax).
7. Lorenz J. On the Quantification of Crowd Wisdom, Optimal Crowd Size, and the Mean-
Median Dilemma. 2021.
8. Galton F. The ballot-box. Nature. 1907;75(1952):509-10.
9. Becker J, Brackbill D, Centola D. Network dynamics of social influence in the wisdom of
crowds. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences. 2017;114(26):E5070-E6.
10. Lorenz J, Rauhut H, Schweitzer F, Helbing D. How social influence can
undermine the wisdom of crowd effect. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences.
2011;108(22):9020-5.
11. Navajas J, Niella T, Garbulsky G, Bahrami B, Sigman M. Aggregated knowledge from
a small number of debates outperforms the wisdom of large crowds. Nature Human
Behaviour. 2018;2(2):126-32.
12. Simmons JP, Nelson LD, Galak J, Frederick S. Intuitive biases in choice versus estimation:
Implications for the wisdom of crowds. Journal of Consumer
Research. 2011;38(1):1-15.
13. Atanasov P, Rescober P, Stone E, Swift SA, Servan-Schreiber E, Tetlock P, et al.
Distilling the wisdom of crowds: Prediction markets vs. prediction polls.
Management science. 2017;63(3):691-706.
14. Palan S, Huber J, Senninger L. Aggregation mechanisms for crowd predictions.
Experimental economics. 2020;23:788-814.
15. Hogg R, McKean J, Craig A. Introduction to mathematical statistics. Upper
Saddle Rover. NJ: Prentice Hall; 2004.

CITA 2023 ISBN: 978-604-80-8083-9